ICC Microteaching Demo
The topic was safety culture.
I
started off by saying "good evening" and by introducing the two readings
regarding safety culture. One is about the Goyang Bus Terminal Fire and
the other is about the Lac Megantic Railway Disaster of summer 2013
(Quebec, Canada).
I did edit the articles slightly as I wanted to
remove all the internet advertising on the articles that were printed
out. Looking back on the lesson I feel that I should have removed a few
paragraphs to get the article down to 1 1/2 (one and a half) pages. On
the second page are several lines that could be removed (example: the
history of the terminal). I would also like to edit the Lac Megantic
article too. Much of what is on the second page could be removed without
causing students problems in understanding the accident. Now I should
add that with font editing I could have gotten the articles down to one
page too.
I am glad that my teacher talk (TT) was minimal as I
quickly mentioned the articles, handed them out and told the students to
answer the four questions regarding the articles.
Things I would
change at this point. One: make different pairs. The students had the
same partners for the previous four/five demos. Two: less questions. I
could have removed the second question (How many people were killed in
Goyang and Lac Megantic?) as I feel four was too many. The other
questions: "What happened in the accidents?"; "What caused the
accidents?"; and "Who is responseible for causing the accident and who
must deal with the problems caused by the accident?" - were more than
enough to keep the pairs busy reading and discussing.
Originally I
was going to get the pairs to go into groups to share their answers to
the four answers. As I was monitoring during the pairwork I noticed that
answering the questions would take more than 3-4 minutes. So instead I
asked the pairs as I walked around the answers to the questions focusing
on #1 (what happened) and #4 (who caused it and who fixes it).
As I
saw that I had little time left I moved onto the groupwork questions:
"What could or should have been done by the government officials and
workers to prevent these accidents?" and "Are these accidents the result
of Korean or Canadian culture? Why, why not?". Instead I should have
stuck to the plan and had them share their answers in the groups first.
Then if I had more time I could have moved onto the group questions.
While
the students were answering the questions in pairs I did not give them
the answers of any hints. I asked them for their answer to the four
questions and I gave feedback of confirmation (that is correct/yes/I
agree, etc.) that I understood them. However, I should have asked follow
up questions to make sure they fully understood the incidents and that
they did not just skim for the answers and copy forgetting other pieces
of information.
No comments:
Post a Comment